NDTV Correspondent
Wednesday, December 17, 2008, (New Delhi)
Politics of terror
Union Minority Affairs Minister A R Antulay on Wednesday raised doubts over whether Pakistani terrorists killed Maharashtra ATS chief Hemant Karkare suggesting it could be due to his investigation of the Malegaon blasts.
My Comments : If Pakistan Or any other Idiot talks this non-sense and rubbish, that is understandable, but if a union minister talks like this, he should be asked to explain this serious charge or should be kicked on ass, shunted out of ministry with his face blackened.
In the light of full media attention and international investigations, even UNO is pointing somewhere, but Antulay would not like to see it because either he is on the pay role of Dawood Ibrahim or is sympathizing with his Muslim brothers.
Idiot AR Antulay's statement is foolish enough to suggest the following:
-First Hindu militants killed Karkare and then handed over the charge to Lashkar to kill other innocents.
-Or Hindu Militants killed Karkare at one spot and Pakistani Muslim Terrorists did the random shooting at Busy markets, Railway Station and Airport.
-Or whole operation was done by Muslim terrorists at the behest of Pakistani involvement.
-Or whole operation was done by Hindu militants.
So, it is your pick who was behind the whole episode.
The controversy led to angry reactions in the Parliament where members were debating two crucial anti-terror bills. One was to establish the new National Investigating Agency(NIA) and another to amend existing anti-terror laws.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
4 comments:
What is the sign of a fanatic...He goes on supporting something even after he sees that it is wrong...This is the result of religious bigotry...But why does Sonia's Congress keep mum over it? Because the Italian cares a damn for India and wants it weakened as much as possible....Vamanan
what is the problem if someone demands investigation in the killing of martyred Mr. Karkare. Congress should appreciate likes of the demands that may show the transparency of the event.
But the congress has echoed the voices of the BJP in the issue. BJP has no right to say that antulay be ousted from the cabint. This is a democratic right of any individual. The 26th November (2008) terror attack on Mumbai has been one of the severest and damaging attack on the social structure of our country. The loss of lives is beyond description, equally worse is that the people of our country lost their faith in the political leadership.
Part of the problem is survival of many a non state terror groups in Pakistan. These were the groups which came in the wake of Russian occupation of Afghanistan. After the defeat of Russian armies in Afghanistan, the left over of these fanatic terrorist groups survived on the soil of Pakistan. The biggest manifestation of changed equations in this direction was the attack by military on Lal Masjid, one of the places for indoctrination of the Muslim youth, during Musharff regime. Similarly the formulation putting Islam as akin to violence and Muslims being the terrorists was created by the US propaganda in the wake of 9/11 and the media taking it forward, large section of Indian media picked it up.
The timing of the attack led to many questions in the mind of society. Just prior to this the Maharashtra Anti Terror Squad did succeed in collecting evidence leading to the arrest of Sadhvi Pragya Thakur, Lt Col. Prasad, Retd Major Upadhyay and others affiliated with RSS politics. Also the role of Bhonsla Military School came to the surface. More and more investigations led to the role of various RSS affiliates as being part of many blasts which took place in front of mosques or in dargah. RSS combine went hammer and tongs against the ATS and particularly its chief Hemant Karkare, accusing him of deliberately arresting Sadhvi and the likes.
Coincidentally attack has depicted the social attention from the heinous deeds of Sadhvi and Co.? Is it a coincidence that Karkare who was bravely doing his job was killed while doing his job? Some of the answers to these questions will be permanently mired in the cloud of mystery. What happened after his death and what is known is that immediately after his death the same elements that were accusing of being biased declared him a hero, a martyr. The self declared champion against terrorism, Mr. Modi, landed up in Mumbai to give interviews in front of TV cameras and also went to the bereaved widow of Karkare and offered her money as relief. Mrs. Karkare with all her dignity and humility turned down the relief from one whose ilk had been criticizing her husband for doing his job honestly. It's a shame that Modi and Co. has not been condemned for such double standards and opportunism which they are indulging in.
Now it is to see whether the legal proceeding started by Mr. Karkare will go to their logical legal end and guilty of many blasts will be punished as per the law of the land.
Antulay is receiving heroe's adulation from Muslims all over India. It speaks volumes about the sorry state of Muslim society, that they have no heroes other than the likes of Antulay, who has the dubious distinction of being the first chief minister to be procecuted. The opportunist has found a chance to endear himself to Muslim masses with his remark. The heroes of Indian Muslim society includes (going backwards in time), AR Antulay, Syed Shahbuddin, Dawood Ibrahim, Osama Bin Laden, Jinnah, Ali Brothers, Sir Syed Ahmed Khan, Ahmed shah Abdali, Shah Waliulla, Tipu Sultan, Aurangzeb,Babur, Allauddin Khilji, Mohammed of Ghor, Mohammed Ghazni, Mohammed bin Kasim. But, there is no place for Dr.APJ Kalam, or Dr.Zakir Hussain.
I do have a question. According to Indian Police investigation it was a in-service Indian Army Lt. Col. responsible train blast that killed 63+ Pakistanis. Should Pakistan ask for the killer of 63 Pakistani citizens?
Post a Comment